Well this is his second map. It's nice, however can be unfair in some ways. However it was a poor attempt and inaccurate, he made Isen bigger than it should, in an interesting way. Besides the fort it was ok. Also their are only three ways into the attackers base, two of em easily defended. Besides that pretty good map.
By Sir Hugh: Read the Review Guidelines and stop flaming.
[Edited on 12/27/07 @ 10:50 AM]
Posted on 11/29/07 @ 02:54 PM
balancing it out
By Sir Hugh: This is pathetic. Review Scores don't need to be sabotaged, even if they are done improperly and abusively. They should be reported instead.
[Edited on 12/27/07 @ 10:53 AM]
Sir Hugh Staff
Posted on 12/27/07 @ 10:57 AM
Everyone cool down, stop flaming, and watch your language. If anymore are made, there will be official warnings in the moderating forum and then bans.
KingChintz, submit your own maps using your own account. It is abusive to rate your own maps.
I have deleted most of the reviews and scores. All of you should read the Review Guidelines every time you score a map. Don't leave the individual fields blank; explain or justify the score by describing the quality of the map. The intended purposes of a review are to provide an accurate score of a map to other downloaders and to provide constructive criticism to the mapper by detailing what was done well and what was done poorly. The reviewer might also be kind enough to impart tips and techniques.
If anyone has any non-mapping comments related to what has happened here, catches wind of flaming, and/or has found a bad review, email me about it at email@example.com.
I made this rate to balance the rate of map. It is pretty cool in some part and bad in other part. I think this map is near 3 as vote so add 1 to all my rates. Some part of map (forest) are well done some other are really bad.